Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Creating a New Poison & the Antidote

Back in my early days in security, we had some geniuses learning specific hacks against systems so they could attack them, then apply for a job to fix the problems they identified.  It was a mild form of extortion.  One of them was a company that identified a new thing, a virus that affected UNIX, once considered to be like Apple, more secure than anything else out there.  That virus was invented in a lab, along with an “antidote” which the company was going to sell.  We all thought that was a dangerous thing to do.  It is almost like inventing a new disease that might kill everyone on the planet, but developing a drug that can kill off the infection.  What surprised us all in government was our white knight turned out to be the National Security Agency (NSA). 
NSA sent lawyers around to talk to these folks and tell them that if this particular virus were to appear in the wild, they were going to be sued.  I think I nearly fell on the floor when that happened.


I see similarities in that situation and the one Kim Zetter identifies in a Wired article earlier this month [ Researchers Create First Firmware Worm that Attacks Macs, 3 August 2015, link ]  Zetter says “The Mac firmware research was conducted by Kovah, owner of LegbaCore, a firmware security consultancy, and Trammell Hudson, a security engineer with Two Sigma Investments. They’ll be discussing their findings on August 6 at the Black Hat security conference in Las Vegas.”  They have identified a problem, built a lab worm to exploit it, and are now going to tell hackers everywhere what the problem is, no doubt making a market for themselves in the process.  This is equally dangerous territory.  There are lots of arguments for identifying vulnerabilities and developing cures for them, but this one is really on the edge of creating a problem and fixing it for profit.  The government needs to take an interest in what they are doing and a stance on whether or not it should be allowed to go on. 

This entry was approved for public release and does not reflect the opinions of the Intelligence Community or the Federal Government.  

No comments:

Post a Comment